European Journal of Science and Research
European Journal of Science and Research
PWSZ in Kalisz Publishing House
Ul. Nowy Świat 4
Guidelines for Authors
How to submit?
Authors are required to submit manuscripts as an e-mail attachment to email@example.com
Prepare the text in Microsoft Word format. Submit the manuscript by sending us as an e-mail attachment to firstname.lastname@example.org and include the following information:
- Contact information of the submitting author
- Information about the authors (affiliation, postal address, e-mail address)
- Subject To Be Publish Under
- Tables and graphics separately in jpg-format (high quality; at least 300 dpi) or Microsoft Excel
- Additionally, please stick to the formal requirements presented below; especially concerning citation and graphics. Manuscripts disregarding the guidelines totally may be returned for revision prior to any reviewing activity.
Organization of the manuscript
These guidelines for research papers are flexible, especially for case studies. Manuscript is to be arranged in the following order:
- Title, author(s), and complete name(s) of institution(s)
- Contact number & valid e-mail address
- Subject to be publish under
- Literature review
- Results and discussion
To structure your manuscript, please try to restrict yourself to a maximum of three levels of headlines.
The title page has to contain the name(s) of all author(s) and their complete mailing addresses with the corresponding author marked clearly. Please use an extra page for the title page.
Articles must include an abstract of 100-150 words. The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. Abstract should not repeat the information which is already present in the title. References should be avoided.
Immediately after the abstract, provide 3-5 key words.
The Introduction presents the purpose of the studies and relationship to previous work in the field. An extensive review of the literature is not required. Use only recent references and provide the most salient information to allow the readers to understand and evaluate the purpose and results of the present study.
The Literature Review section should be brief. Cite previously published books and papers (only contained in the References).
The Methods section should concise with sufficient technical information. Only new methods should be described in detail.
Results and discussion:
The Results and Discussion section should include the rationale or design, optimization, validation of the experiments as well as the results of the experiments. You should focus on the interpretation of the results with proper justification.
References and footnotes:
Maximum 30 references for original research papers.
Citation in text:
Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Citations in the text contain only authors’ names and year of publication (Author, Year) [e.g. (Kamiński, 2017), (Rącka and Wenerska, 2018) or (Krajewska et al., 2015) when three or more authors].
Full references have to be included at the end of the paper in alphabetical order using the following style:
(Year). Title, Edition ed. Publisher, City. Siemińska, E., ed., (2011): Investment on the Real Estate Market, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
Author. (Year): Title, in: Book Title, (Ed.)^(Eds.), Publisher. City, pp. Pages.
Malienė, V., Atkinson, I., Šubic Kovač, M., Pȍdör, A., Nyiri Mizseiné, J., Dixon-Gough, R., Hernik, J., Pazdan, M., Gaudėšius, R., Gurskienė, V. (2016): Property Markets and Real Estate Valuation Practice in Central and Eastern Europe – Slovenia, Hungary, Poland and Lithuania, in: Real Estate, Construction and Economic Development in Emerging Market Economies, eds. Abdulai, R. A., Obeng-Odoom, F., Ochieng, E., Maliene, V., Routledge, New York, USA, pp. 296–357.
Author. (Year). Title. Journal, Volume, Pages.
Kamiński, P. (2017). Organisational ICT Security. European Journal of Science and Research, 1, p. 16-22.
Rącka, I. and Wenerska, B. (2018). Assessing the Quality of Urban Environment in the Downtown of Kalisz. European Journal of Science and Research, 2, p. 124-141.
[name of author], [first letter of first name] ([year of publication]): [title], available at [address of website], accessed [date of last retrieval].
Swinkels, R.A. (2014): Laboration of integration strategies for urban marginalized communities: integrated summary, available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/257691468333035092/Elaboration-of-integration-strategies-for-urban-marginalized-communities-integrated-summary, accessed 16 June 2018.
Tables and figures:
Tables must have titles and sufficient empirical detail in a legend immediately following the title to be understandable without reference to the text. Each column in a table must have a heading, and abbreviations, when necessary, should be defined in the legend. Please number the tables.
Figures should have titles and explanatory legends containing sufficient detail to make the figure easily understood.
Appropriately sized numbers, letters, and symbols should be used. The abscissa and ordinate should be clearly labelled with appropriately sized type.
The Editor-in-Chief responsible for your submission might ask you to change the format of your files in order to publish it. If the manuscript does not fulfil the formal requirements, the paper might be denied publication.
Peer Review Process
Participation in the peer-review process is absolutely essential to the success and reputation of the journal. Reviewers along with the editors determine which work is of quality and significance.
The journal uses double-blind system for peer-review; both reviewers and authors’ identities remain anonymous. The paper will be peer-reviewed by three experts; two reviewers from outside and one editor from the journal typically involve in reviewing a submission.
For publication, each article is reviewed by the editorial team, checked whether the editing requirements were followed and if it is related to the topic of the journal.
In terms of the scientific content, each article – without the name of the author(s) – is sent to two reviewers from outside and one editor from the journal involve in reviewing of submission (Step 1). The comments of reviewers will be sent to the author by the editorial board to make the recommended changes, if necessary (Step 2). Then, the checked article is sent back to the reviewers (Step 3).
If at least one of the reviewers considers that the article does not fulfil the scientific terms of publication, the Editorial Board can refuse its publication. For the evaluation of an article (Step 1), reviewers will take into account: importance of debated issues, adequacy of literature review, rigor of methodology used, rigor of analysis (appropriate interpretation), provision of sufficient experimental material , interpretation of results, clarity of writing, adequacy of abstract and keywords, introduction and conclusions, accuracy of the title and contribution to the study of EJSR area of interests.
List of Reviewers
Dariusz Nowak, Poznań University of Economics and Business
Call for Reviewers
If you’re interested in serving as a reviewer of EJSR, kindly send your resumes to email@example.com (only Ph.D. holders are qualified to apply for reviewers).
Working language: English
Working style: Internet-based
Payment: Voluntary job, no payment
Reviewer’s name will be listed in the printed journal and on the journal’s homepage. EJSR provides certificates to the reviewers.
a) possess a doctoral degree in the specific subject related closely to the journal;
b) hold a job at a university or academic organization, in a teaching or research position;
c) be fluent in academic and professional English;
d) have a strong interest in scholarly journal;
e) work quickly and accurately to tight deadlines.
How to apply
1. Complete application form for Reviewer
2. Send your application form to the journal’s e-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org